Florida International University Plagiarism and AI Policy
Last verified October 24, 2026 · AI-assisted research and drafting · Maintained by Plagiarism Checker Online, operated by Markus Nick
The short answer: According to the published guidance checked October 24, 2026: FIU CAT advises instructors to specify permitted AI uses and acknowledgment rules in their syllabus. Its page offers different model policies, including a no-acknowledgment option; those examples are not one campus-wide permission or disclosure rule. SCAI evaluates reported AI cases using the reporting professor's syllabus policy and the Code.
Key facts, with sources
| Topic | What the school publishes | Source |
|---|---|---|
| School | Public, four-year institution in Miami, FL | Source |
| Official policy | Academic integrity policy | Source |
| Honor code | FIU-2501 Student Conduct and Honor Code | Source |
| Plagiarism definition | The Code includes unattributed work written by another person or generated by an automated tool, whether paraphrased or copied exactly or almost exactly. Helping another student submit such work is also included. | Source |
| Generative AI | Instructor decides. FIU CAT advises instructors to specify permitted AI uses and acknowledgment rules in their syllabus. Its page offers different model policies, including a no-acknowledgment option; those examples are not one campus-wide permission or disclosure rule. SCAI evaluates reported AI cases using the reporting professor's syllabus policy and the Code. Instructor syllabus statements. | Source |
| Sanctions | Published options, not a mandatory sequence or an individual outcome; see the linked policy. | Source |
| Appeals | Appeals go to the Chief Student Affairs Officer or designee using the form and instructions in the decision letter. They review the file, not a fresh hearing. Grounds concern substantially outcome-affecting procedural/rights failures, qualifying unavailable new information, or disproportionate sanctions. Suspension or expulsion is not automatically stayed by an appeal; the SCAI Director has discretion to stay it. Deadline stated: The appeal form must be received no later than 5 p.m. on the seventh Business Day after delivery of the hearing decision letter. It must be completed and signed by the appealing party. Consult the Code's Business Day definition and the decision letter.. | Source |
| Reporting office | Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) Administers the Student Conduct and Honor Code; the incident-report route is linked from this office page. | Source |
| Earlier coursework | Submitting essentially the same work for credit more than once is multiple submission. The Code excepts reuse with the current instructor's prior written approval. | Source |
| Resolution routes | The overview distinguishes summary resolution, an administrative hearing and a Student Conduct Committee hearing. A summary resolution requires the respondent to waive a hearing and applicable unmet proceeding rights; it is not an automatic admission at an information session. | Source |
| Student rights and scope | The SCAI overview lists notice of charges, a presumption of no violation, an impartial hearing, an advisor, evidence review and an appeal opportunity. An information session is not itself a disciplinary proceeding, although it may become a summary resolution after relevant rights are waived. | Source |
| Summary scope | Independent AI-assisted summary, not affiliated with FIU. Uses the active June16,2025 FIU-2501 version, SCAI's public process overview and CAT's teaching guidance. Suggested AI syllabus language is not treated as a uniform university rule. Course sanctions, university sanctions and program action are distinct. | Source |
Published outcomes and review levels
These are the published options or review limits below, not a predicted outcome or an automatic sequence. Follow the linked policy for the applicable process.
- Course-related and educational options. After a responsibility finding, instructors recommend course sanctions and SCAI communicates the outcome. SCAI may assign course sanctions if no recommendation is provided. University options include reprimands, educational activities and probation.
- Separation and program consequences. University options also include suspension and permanent expulsion. For graduate/professional students the program separately determines whether program action is necessary. Circumstances and history matter; the options are not an automatic sequence.
What students at Florida International University should know
FIU's Code distinguishes unauthorized assistance from unattributed submission. Its cheating provisions include automated tools, while its plagiarism provisions include material generated by an automated tool without proper acknowledgment. For a student, that means two separate checks: was the use permitted, and was the source acknowledged as required? The Center for the Advancement of Teaching gives instructors alternative syllabus policies rather than one universal AI rule. Read your own course policy before relying on any sample, including examples that permit use without acknowledgment. If a case is reported, SCAI administers the conduct process; a professor's suspicion is not itself the final determination. The public overview lists notice, an impartial hearing, evidence review and advisor rights. An information session provides process information and access to the available charge material. It is not automatically a disciplinary hearing, although a respondent may waive relevant rights to seek summary resolution. The Code separates instructor recommendations on course sanctions from SCAI's university sanctions and possible graduate or professional program action. It also requires prior written instructor approval for reuse covered by its multiple-submission exception. If you receive a hearing decision, an appeal is a file review on listed grounds, not a second full hearing. The form must be received by 5 p.m. on the seventh Business Day after delivery of the decision letter. Use the letter's instructions and the Code's day definition. Do not assume an appeal automatically pauses suspension or expulsion.
Frequently asked questions
No. CAT offers alternative approaches for instructors. Read the actual course policy; the page says SCAI evaluates reported AI cheating or plagiarism using the reporting professor's AI syllabus policy and the Code.
No. The public overview distinguishes it from a disciplinary proceeding. It can transition to summary resolution if the respondent waives the relevant rights and asks for that option.
The Code requires receipt by 5 p.m. on the seventh Business Day after delivery of the hearing decision letter. Use the letter's form and instructions, and consult the Code's Business Day definition. An appeal is a file review on listed grounds, and suspension or expulsion is not automatically stayed.
Every row links to its source. Independent summary, not affiliated with Florida International University. Found a mistake? Report a correction.
To go further, continue with the overview of university AI policies.
If you want the wider context, see the guide to using AI in papers.
Check your own paper next
A report can support your own review; it does not establish permission or decide academic misconduct. From $0.29 per page, minimum order $0.90.
Start plagiarism check