University of Maryland Global Campus AI Policy
Last verified October 24, 2026 · AI-assisted research and drafting · Maintained by Plagiarism Checker Online, operated by Markus Nick
The short answer: According to the published guidance checked October 24, 2026: The syllabus statement reproduced by UMGC Library generally permits GenAI for brainstorming, background information, clarifying research questions and learning coding/math concepts only where use aligns with assignment requirements and learning goals. Submitted AI content should have citation or other attribution. Ask the instructor if uncertain; attribution alone does not override assignment limits.
Key facts, with sources
| Topic | What the school publishes | Source |
|---|---|---|
| School | Public, four-year institution in Adelphi, MD | Source |
| Official policy | Academic integrity policy | Source |
| Plagiarism definition | Policy 150.25 includes using others' work or presenting their ideas as one's own without proper citation or attribution. Its examples include unattributed verbatim AI-generated material, repeated citation failures and invented citations. | Source |
| Generative AI | Permitted with disclosure. The syllabus statement reproduced by UMGC Library generally permits GenAI for brainstorming, background information, clarifying research questions and learning coding/math concepts only where use aligns with assignment requirements and learning goals. Submitted AI content should have citation or other attribution. Ask the instructor if uncertain; attribution alone does not override assignment limits. | Source |
| Sanctions | Published options, not a mandatory sequence or an individual outcome; see the linked policy. | Source |
| Writing center | Effective Writing Center | Source |
| Appeals | A student may request an appeal by emailing the Case Manager at integrityreview@umgc.edu. AVP-OAIA assesses whether grounds are met; if accepted, a separate written appeal follows. Grounds are relevant new information not reasonably available at Full Review and/or documented specific policy/procedure deviations. Dissatisfaction alone is not sufficient. The Initial Inquiry determination is not appealable. Deadline stated: Request: within five Business Days of the Decision being sent. If granted, the policy allows five Business Days to submit the written appeal under the accompanying Procedures. Business Days are weekdays 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern, excluding university holidays/closures; the period begins the next Business Day after sending.. | Source |
| Reporting office | Office of Academic Integrity and Accountability (OAIA) | Source |
| Policy effective | December 2, 2024 | Source |
| Responding to a notice | If a Full Review is opened and the student chooses to respond, the written response to the Notice is due within five Business Days after the Notice is sent. This is distinct from a later request to appeal the Decision. | Source |
| Summary scope | Independent AI-assisted summary of UMGC Policy150.25 (version effective December2,2024) and cited library/support guidance. Not affiliated with UMGC. Full Review notice response, appeal request and written appeal are distinct stages; no individual outcome is predicted. | Source |
In the school's own words
“without providing proper citation or attribution”
Plagiarism definition: source, checked October 24, 2026.
“as long as they align with an assignment's requirements”
Generative AI policy: source, checked October 24, 2026.
Published outcomes and review levels
These are the published options or review limits below, not a predicted outcome or an automatic sequence. Follow the linked policy for the applicable process.
- Educational remediation. The policy distinguishes non-disciplinary educational remediation from disciplinary consequences; it is not promised for every first case.
- Disciplinary consequences. Published options include course failure, disciplinary probation, suspension, dismissal and expulsion. These are possible outcomes under the policy, not an automatic ordered sequence.
What students at University of Maryland Global Campus should know
UMGC's support for generative AI is conditional, not permission to outsource an assessment. The library reproduces a syllabus statement allowing uses such as brainstorming and clarifying concepts when they fit the assignment's requirements and learning goals. Submitted AI content should be cited or otherwise attributed. The integrity policy separately includes unattributed AI-generated material and invented citations within its plagiarism provisions. If a report progresses to Full Review, distinguish the first response from an appeal: the written Notice invites a response within five Business Days of being sent, while a later Decision starts a separate five-Business-Day period for requesting an appeal. UMGC defines Business Days as weekdays between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern, excluding university holidays and closures; a deadline period starts on the next Business Day after the communication is sent. An accepted appeal request is not the finished appeal: a further written appeal must follow under the published procedure. Qualifying new information or documented policy/procedure deviations are the stated grounds, not dissatisfaction alone. Contact the assigned Case Manager or OAIA about the instructions that apply to you. For writing assistance before a problem arises, the Effective Writing Center provides resources and paper-review support. Neither general AI permission nor writing-center help replaces the requirements of your particular assignment.
Frequently asked questions
No. The library's syllabus statement generally permits listed learning uses only where they align with assignment requirements and intended learning goals. AI content submitted with an assignment should be attributed, but citation does not cancel assignment restrictions. Ask the instructor before using a tool if you are uncertain.
No. A response to the initial written Notice is due within five Business Days of the Notice being sent if the student chooses to respond. A later Decision creates a distinct appeal-request stage. Follow the dates and instructions in each communication rather than treating one reply as both.
Relevant new information not reasonably available during Full Review, or documented specific deviations from policy or procedures. Dissatisfaction with the decision or consequence alone is not a valid ground. An appeal request must first be accepted before the separate written appeal proceeds.
Every row links to its source. Independent summary, not affiliated with University of Maryland Global Campus. Found a mistake? Report a correction.
For background, read our free AI usage statement tool.
For background, read our article on AI writing in academic papers.
Check before you submit
A report can support your own review; it does not establish permission or decide academic misconduct. From $0.29 per page, minimum order $0.90.
Start plagiarism check