University of Phoenix Plagiarism and AI Policy
Last verified October 24, 2026 · AI-assisted research and drafting · Maintained by Plagiarism Checker Online, operated by Markus Nick
The short answer: According to the published guidance checked October 24, 2026: The Online Catalog lists appropriate support such as proofreading, refining an original draft and tutoring, but requires a statement naming the tools and explaining their use. AI must not replace the student's learning or be the sole basis for assignments. APA citation and disclosure apply to AI-created or modified content; students should be prepared to document their process and consult course instructions.
Key facts, with sources
| Topic | What the school publishes | Source |
|---|---|---|
| School | Private for-profit, four-year institution in Phoenix, AZ | Source |
| Official policy | Academic integrity policy | Source |
| Plagiarism definition | The catalog covers intentional or unintentional presentation of another's work without attribution as one's own, including outside assignments and AI-generated output. Word-for-word quotations need quotation marks and citations. | Source |
| Generative AI | Permitted with disclosure. The Online Catalog lists appropriate support such as proofreading, refining an original draft and tutoring, but requires a statement naming the tools and explaining their use. AI must not replace the student's learning or be the sole basis for assignments. APA citation and disclosure apply to AI-created or modified content; students should be prepared to document their process and consult course instructions. | Source |
| Citation styles | APA Writing standards vary by degree and course level; students should follow the applicable Center for Writing Excellence guidelines consistent with APA. | Source |
| Writing center | Center for Writing Excellence | Source |
| Detection tools named by the school | SafeAssign. Named in the school's own words, we do not infer tools. The July2026 course-policies document names SafeAssign in Blackboard or another checker the university considers appropriate. It says submitted papers enter the applicable reference database; this is not a claim of no storage, AI-detection deployment or a safe similarity score. | Source |
| Earlier coursework | Submitting identical or substantially similar earlier work requires specific authorization by course faculty or the course curriculum. | Source |
| Responding to a notice | For a faculty inquiry about possible inappropriate AI use, the catalog requires a response within five days of receipt. A missing response may result in a zero; late replies or replies after course end need not be considered. Faculty may discuss content and references and use knowledge checks. This is a response rule, not a general disciplinary appeal deadline. | Source |
| Summary scope | Independent AI-assisted summary of the 2026-2027 Online Catalog updated October1,2026, printed pages83,85-86, and course policies revised July1,2026. Not affiliated with the university. The course document directs competency-based students to separate CBE policies; no universal appeal period or sanction sequence inferred. | Source |
What students at University of Phoenix should know
University of Phoenix's Online Catalog for 2026-2027, updated October 1, 2026, distinguishes useful AI assistance from replacing the student's own academic work. It lists examples such as proofreading, refining an original draft and personalized tutoring, while requiring a statement identifying the tools and explaining their use. Students should also be prepared to show prompts, drafts or revision notes. Treat that guidance as an obligation to explain your process, not permission to submit an unexamined AI answer. The conduct code separately includes unattributed AI output in its plagiarism provisions. Reusing an earlier assignment also needs specific authorization from course faculty or the course curriculum. Before uploading or resubmitting, check the actual assignment and the policy applicable to your program. The July 2026 course-policies document directs competency-based students to a separate CBE document in their Course Guide, so its rules should not simply be assumed to cover that program unchanged. It also names SafeAssign in Blackboard or another university-approved plagiarism checker and describes inclusion of submitted papers in the reference database. No safe matching percentage follows from that description. If faculty contact you about suspected inappropriate AI use, the Online Catalog states a five-day response period from receipt of the inquiry and permits a zero where the student does not respond. This is not presented as a general misconduct appeal deadline. Writing-format requirements vary by degree level; consult the applicable Center for Writing Excellence guidance.
Frequently asked questions
The course-policies document revised July1,2026 names SafeAssign in Blackboard or another checker the university deems appropriate. It also describes storing submitted papers as source documents in the applicable reference database. This does not establish a safe matching percentage or the enabled AI-detection features.
No. The Online Catalog uses it for responding to a faculty inquiry about possible inappropriate AI use, counted from receipt. A missing response may lead to a zero, and late replies or replies after course end need not be considered. Follow the actual notice and applicable disciplinary procedure for any separate appeal.
The conduct code treats identical or substantially similar earlier submissions as self-plagiarism unless the course faculty or course curriculum specifically authorizes reuse. Do not assume that adding a self-citation alone supplies that authorization.
Every row links to its source. Independent summary, not affiliated with University of Phoenix. Found a mistake? Report a correction.
If you want the wider context, see the AI usage statement generator.
For background, read how AI writing is treated in academic work.
Check your own paper next
A report can support your own review; it does not establish permission or decide academic misconduct. From $0.29 per page, minimum order $0.90.
Start plagiarism check